Article contents
Divine Justice in Mesopotamia: O sagacious mentor, come, let me tell you!
Abstract
Since the nineteenth century, scholars have been actively engaged in rereading and reinterpreting the foundational myths and their formative texts in an attempt to uncover the existential insights and enduring questions that have continually preoccupied human thought. Among the most significant of these is the Babylonian Theodicy—presented here in the researcher’s own translation—also known as O Sagacious Mentor, Come, Let Me Tell You. This text represents one of the earliest endeavors in history to question the traditional paradigm of reward and punishment. The dilemma of the Theodicy unfolds through an extended dialogue between a suffering man recounting his afflictions and a wise friend who strives to justify the wisdom of the gods in Mesopotamia. Within this context, the relevance of modern intellectual approaches becomes evident, particularly those grounded in psychoanalytic theory for interpreting collective behavior and foundational symbols. Accordingly, the Theodicy may be regarded as an early manifestation of the tension between divine authority and the individual’s quest to comprehend divine justice.
لطالما عكف الإنسان المعاصر على إعادة قراءة الأساطير المؤسسة ونصوصها التأسيسية، لما تنطوي عليه من رؤى وجودية وأسئلة كانت ولا تزال تؤرق الفكر البشري. ومن أبرز هذه النصوص تلك التي تناولت قضية العدالة الإلهية في أدب بلاد ما بين النهرين، والمعروفة بعنوان «العدالة الإلهية» أو «الإلهيات البابلية» - وهو نصٌّ من ترجمة المؤلف ويَرِد في متن البحث-إذ يمثّل إحدى أوائل المحاولات الفردية في التاريخ للتشكيك في معادلة الثواب والعقاب. تتجسّد هذه الإشكالية في حوارٍ مطوّلٍ بين رجلٍ معذّبٍ يروي معاناته وصديقٍ حكيمٍ يحاول شرح حكمة الآلهة في بلاد ما بين النهرين.
Article information
Journal
International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation
Volume (Issue)
8 (7)
Pages
190-202
Published
Copyright
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Aims & scope
Call for Papers
Article Processing Charges
Publications Ethics
Google Scholar Citations
Recruitment