Article contents
Critically Examining Perceptions of Different Englishes in the IELTS Speaking Section: Who Decides What is Acceptable?
Abstract
The International English Language Testing System (IELTS) has become the worldwide benchmark for evaluating English language proficiency. However, the IELTS exam is not without its critics. It has been accused of being elitist and unaccommodating of test-takers who are not users of the prestige varieties of English, even though these people may need to take the exam for employment or immigration purposes. This study involved a focus group of experienced IELTS examiners who were given a number of listenings from non-standard yet still ‘native speakers’ of English to evaluate using the IELTS speaking bands. The focus group found that the IELTS speaking descriptors are not fit for purpose when dealing with non-standard or regional varieties of English. This study makes a case for the creators of the IELTS exam to adjust their grading criteria and examiner training to be more inclusive of all English varieties.
Article information
Journal
Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices
Volume (Issue)
3 (4)
Pages
08-15
Published
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Article information
- Journal
- Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices
- Volume and issue
- 3 (4)
- Pages
- 08-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2021.3.4.2
- Received
- April 14, 2021
- Published
- April 25, 2021
- Similarity screening
- Completed
- Peer Review
- This article has been peer reviewed.
- Copyright and licence
- © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
- How to cite
- Colin Michell (2021). Critically Examining Perceptions of Different Englishes in the IELTS Speaking Section: Who Decides What is Acceptable?. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 3(4), 08-15. https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2021.3.4.2
Article status
Citation tools
Article QR code
Scan this code to open the DOI or article page on another device.

Aims & scope
Call for Papers
Article Processing Charges
Publications Ethics
Google Scholar Citations
Recruitment