Article contents
Brainstorming: The Need for Professionalization of Facilitators and Participants.
Abstract
Brainstorming is an old and widely used process designed to help organizations generate ideas. It has not changed much since its introduction in 1953, and the general consensus today is that, more often than not, it does not produce satisfactory results. This paper examines why that is so and what can be done to improve the brainstorming process. The authors believe that the recommendations put forward here represent a significant modification, not only to the brainstorming process but to the way organizations need to approach and organize their brainstorming sessions. The paper challenges long standing practices and assumptions regarding brainstorming. The authors conclude, after conducting their own primary research with brainstorming participant groups, that two of the four guidelines which creator Alex Osborn originally specified are beyond the expertise of most brainstorming group participants and require specific training. The lack of this pre-training of participants is why most ideation sessions fail, though professionalisation of facilitation is also likely to improve brainstorming outcomes.
Article information
Journal
Journal of Business and Management Studies
Volume (Issue)
5 (2)
Pages
72-82
Published
Copyright
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Article information
- Journal
- Journal of Business and Management Studies
- Volume and issue
- 5 (2)
- Pages
- 72-82
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2023.5.2.9
- Received
- March 26, 2023
- Published
- March 26, 2023
- Similarity screening
- Completed
- Peer Review
- This article has been peer reviewed.
- Copyright and licence
- © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
- How to cite
- Arthur D. Gogatz, Mark Azavedo (2023). Brainstorming: The Need for Professionalization of Facilitators and Participants.. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(2), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2023.5.2.9
Article status
Citation tools
Article QR code
Scan this code to open the DOI or article page on another device.

Aims & scope
Call for Papers
Article Processing Charges
Publication Ethics
Google Scholar Citations
Recruitment